Betterchem
Health     Drug Information     DMFs     Portal     21CFR     Search     Site Map

 


Veterinary Drugs

 
Product and
NADA/ANADA Number
Trade Name
Ingredients
kanamycin, pectin, bismuth subcarbonate, activated attapulgite (aluminum magnesium silicate)
042-841
Amforol; Veterinary Oral Tablets
kanamycin, pectin, bismuth subcarbonate, activated attapulgite (aluminum magnesium silicate)

Back to TOC


API Locator: A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U-Z

Home | Drug Thesaurus | Veterinary Master Files | Version with API Search | Services | Site Map

Summary of 
FDA Information:

FOI Summary; NADA 042-841 (supplement); Amforol® (Kanamycin, pectin, bismuth subcarbonate, activated attapulgite); re: revised formulation for
Amforol®, without aminopentamide hydrogen sulfate; Feburary 21, 1991 --Editor's abstract I. GENERAL INFORMATION NADA Number: 042-841 Sponsor: Fort Dodge Laboratories Division of
American Home Products 800 5th Street NW Ford Dodge, IA 50501-0518 Generic Name: Kanamycin, pectin, bismuth subcarbonate, activated attapulgite (aluminum magnesium silicate) Trade Name: Amforol® Veterinary Oral Tablets Marketing Status: Rx Effect of
Supplement: This supplement provides for
a revised formulation for
Amforol® Veterinary Oral Tablets without aminopentamide hydrogen sulfate.
The following issues are addressed: A. Dose of
aminopentamide in original formulation B. Rationale for
removing aminopentamide C. Safety and
efficacy of
new formulation II. DOSE OF AMINOPENTAMIDE IN ORIGINAL FORMULATION Aminopentamide is an antispasmodic and
anticholinergic agent which
reduces peristalsis thereby reducing propulsive activity.
The amount of
aminopentamide in Amforol's original formulation was
0.033 mg per tablet, only 1/6 to 1/12 of
the dose recommended when
aminopentamide alone is given orally to the dog. III. RATIONALE FOR REMOVING AMINOPENTAMIDE In recent years, clinicians have modified their recommendations for
the treatment of
acute non-specific diarrhea. Published literature now suggests that the
use of
antispasmodics / anticholinergics is not indicated in the
routine treatment of
small animals with diarrhea.
They may produce intractable diarrhea due to ileus. In cases of
spasmodic diarrhea, antispasmodics / anticholinergics may result in a therapeutic benefit. However, the
use of
anticholinergics should be restricted to documented cases of
spasmodic diarrhea since their routine use in other types of
diarrhea may impair normal motility.
The following references suggest that anticholinergic drugs like aminopentamide may be contraindicated in the
routine management of
diarrhea.
A . Wilson, R. C.: Antimotility drugs used in treatment of
diarrhea. JAVMA, 180:776-777, 1982. B. Strombeck, D. R.: Management of
diarrhea: Motility modifiers and
adjunct therapy. IN, Current Veterinary Therapy, VII, 1980. C. Chiapella A. M.: Treatment of
Intestinal Disease. IN, The Veterinary Clinics of
North America, 567-584, August 1983. D. Reves R., et al: Failure to Demonstrate Effectiveness of
an Anticholinergic Drug in the
Symptomatic Treatment of
Acute Travelers Diarrhea. 5:223-227, 1983. IV. EFFICACY OF NEW FORMULATION The removal of
aminopentamide hydrogen sulfate which
was
present at subtherapeutic levels will not
have an adverse effect on the product's efficacy.
The new formulation provides: Kanamycin, a broad-spectrum antibiotic Pectin Attapulgite (aluminum magnesium silicate), an activated clay mineral Bismuth subcarbonate The following references support the efficacy of
the reformulated product: Federal Register Vol. 51, 161 38-49, No. 83 (4/30/86) Federal Register Vol. 35, 11707, No. 141 (7/22/70) Dekker, W. and
K. Reisma, Treatment of
Duodenal Ulcers with Bismuth, Annals of
Clinical Research, Vol. 11, pp. 94-97, 1979. V. SAFETY OF NEW FORMULATION Kanamycin sulfate Orally administered kanamycin sulfate is generally considered to be poorly absorbed systemically through intact intestinal mucosa, although the possibility of
increased absorption through ulcerated or
denuded areas should be considered especially when
the dose is increased. Dogs, particularly those weighing less than 5 pounds, should be observed for
systemic nephrotoxic and
ototoxic side effects due to systemic absorption of
kanamycin sulfate from
ulcerated areas following oral administration. Since orally administered kanamycin sulfate is not expected to reach therapeutic levels, Amforol should not be prescribed for
treating Salmonella septicemia.
A "Contraindication" appears on the labeling as follows: "Amforol is contraindicated in treatment of
Salmonella septicemias." Bismuth subcarbonate Orally administered bismuth subcarbonate is an insoluble salt and
generally not absorbed in significant amounts.
There is documentation of
systemic absorption from
an ulcerated gastrointestinal tract. Systemically available bismuth has been associated with hepatopathy, nephropathy and
neurotoxicity in humans.
The neurotoxic syndrome has been characterized by lack of
energy, muscle twitching, confusion, convulsions and
coma. Winship, K.
A ."Toxicity of
Bismuth Salts" Adv. Drug React. Ac. Pois. Rev. 2 1983 103-121. Hoffman, R. S. et al "Bismuth Absorption and
Myotonic Encephalopathies After Bismuth Subsalicylate Therapy" Vet Hum Toxicol 31 (4) Aug. 1989. An adverse reaction reported central nervous system disfunction in two dogs after use of
Amforol Suspension at the
recommended dose.
The "Side Effects" section of
the labeling includes: "The bismuth subcarbonate in Amforol (Veterinary Oral Tablets) may produce darkening of
the tongue and
stools which
can be confused with melena. Prolonged exposure to orally administered bismuth salts has been associated with encephalopathies in other species. Signs may include lack of
energy, muscle twitching, confusion, convulsions and
comas." Activated attapulgite (aluminum magnesium silicate) and
pectin when
orally administered have not been reported to produce toxicity. See the original FOI for
additional information. VI. AGENCY CONCLUSIONS Removal of
aminopentamide increases the safety of
Amforol.
The reformulation is supported by substantial evidence of
safety and
effectiveness as found in the
veterinary and
human medical literature.
The effectiveness of
the reformulated product is also based on data in the
original approval human monographs for
antidiarrheal products and
NAS/NRC reviews.
The data meet the requirements of
Section 512 of
the Act and
Section 514.111 of
the implementing regulations.
The data demonstrate that the
product when
used according to the approved labeling is safe and
effective for
the treatment of
bacterial enteritis caused by susceptible strains of
E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella, Alcaligenes faecalis, Proteus spp. and
Staphylococcus aureus.
This product must be dispensed under
a prescription because the expertise of
a veterinarian is necessary for
the diagnosis of
etiologies causing enteritis.
A veterinarian's expertise is also needed to monitor response to treatment and
to detect and
treat adverse reactions if they occur. Under section 512(c)(2)(F)(iii) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and

Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(c)(2)(F)(iii), this change in the
drug product does not qualify for
exclusivity because new clinical or
field investigations were
not required for
approval.

© 2009 Betterchem.com